Useful without overclaiming.
Inner Paths aims to explain personality and self-reflection tools clearly while preserving uncertainty and disagreement. Both ends of a trait continuum must be described fairly. Symbolic story details are never presented as hidden psychological facts.
Source standards
Foundational claims should rely on original research, professional standards, official test documentation, universities, government sources, and high-quality reviews. Another personality blog is not sufficient evidence for a psychological claim. Every published article requires a source list that directly supports its claims.
Authorship and review
A human author remains responsible for source selection, claim wording, and publication. AI may assist with outlining, summarizing supplied sources, or copyediting, but is not listed as an expert reviewer. Reviewers are named only with their permission and truthful credentials. Material awaiting the appropriate review stays unpublished.
Corrections and updates
Material errors should be corrected visibly, with an updated date and a correction note when the change affects interpretation. Foundational evergreen content is reviewed at least annually once the review program is active; faster-moving legal, product, or research claims require shorter intervals.
Commercial boundaries
V1 has no advertising, paid report, sponsorship, or affiliate system. Any future commercial relationship must be labeled and must not change quiz answers, scores, editorial conclusions, or result recommendations. Assessment responses are prohibited from advertising profiles.